Judge overturns Geert Wilders ban in UK

By • on October 13, 2009

From the Guardian:

Ed West

Ed West is a journalist and social commentator who specialises in politics, religion and low culture.

Geert Wilders is free to enter Britain

It’s being reported that Dutch MP Geert Wilders has won his appeal against being banned from the UK. According to Radio Netherlands:

The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal in London has ruled that the British government was wrong to deny populist Dutch politician Geert Wilders entry to the United Kingdom. Mr Wilders planned to show his film Fitna to the British parliament. The government refused to allow him to enter the UK on the grounds that he represented a threat to public order. It is not clear whether the tribunal’s decision means that Mr Wilders is now free to travel to the UK. The British government has not yet reacted to the ruling.

Whether or not one agrees with Wilders’ views on Islam, which make me look like “Koran” Armstrong in comparison, the ban was outrageous. Britain allows all sorts of shady and colourful foreigners to use our premises for their nefarious activities – in contrast here was an elected representative of a democratic European party who was invited by two British parliamentarians to privately broadcast a film about religious fundamentalism.

Wilders had every right to come here, and as far as I can see the only reason he was banned was cowardly British fear of French-style riots. Lord Ahmed, a self-proclaimed Muslim “leader” who, unlike Wilders, has never been elected by anyone, said that Wilders’s criticism of his religion was “an incitement of religious and racial hatred”. He denies saying he would bring down 10,000 protesters to the Lords, but there was a definite air of surrender in the air.

Meanwhile the Government’s great friends, the Muslim Council of Britain, called Wilders “an open and relentless preacher of hate”. (This is the same MCB that has been reluctant to attend Holocaust Memorial Day and objects to mention of the “alleged Armenian genocide” and the “so-called gay Holocaust”.)

Wilders for his part has never preached hatred against any people, only a religion, and has flatly said “I don’t hate Muslims, I hate Islam”. (Plenty of my friends absolutely hate Christianity and wish it driven off the face of the earth, but I don’t take it as a personal affront. That’s because I’m a grown-up). Wilders has also compared the Koran to Mein Kampf and its founder to a terrorist, and has talked about a growing Islamic population with dread. He said: “Take a walk down the street and see where this is going. You no longer feel like you are living in your own country. There is a battle going on and we have to defend ourselves. Before you know it there will be more mosques than churches.”

Whether or not one shares his views on Islam, and I disagree that there can’t be a “moderate Muslim” (I think there can, and are), there is rich irony in a situation where a man warning about Islam threatening western freedoms is banned from speaking in the very home of Parliamentary democracy. (Another irony, of course, that it’s the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal that has ruled in favour of a man who wants to keep terrorists out.)

Wilders has called it “fantastisch nieuws”, and I for one agree.

Comments

By Trenchant Commentator on October 14th, 2009 at 7:35 am

Only people who have never resided in the Middle East for a significant period of time maintain that “moderate Islam” is possible. “Moderate Islam” is and always will be impossible in the Middle East. What MIGHT be possible is a “reformed Islam” taking shape in the democratic West.

But as long as “pundits” claim a “possibility” for “moderate Islam” (thereby implying same is possible in the Islamic ME), Western freedoms will continue to be sacrificed at the altar of the currently “unmoderate, fundamentalist Islamofascism”.

It is a pity that the vast majority of Canaduians and Americans live their entire lives within a 500 mile radius of their birthplaces. Such is not a fertile breeding ground for informed punditry. It’s a shame, really, and the reason I am glad I am in my 50s and not my 20s. Ineffective, pie-in-the-sky pundits virtually ensure the establishment of a Ministry of Truth to manage the fictitious narrative of “moderate Islam”.

By Henrik R Clausen on October 15th, 2009 at 2:29 am

The autocratic, totalitarian British government was quoted in Danish press for ‘regret’ about the decision and is considering an appeal.

Formerly Great Britain doesn’t even know that Freedom of Expression is a positive value and is to be protected. It aids and abets religious intimidation and stands on the side of thugs, not on the side of civilization.

By Henrik R Clausen on October 15th, 2009 at 2:29 am

The autocratic, totalitarian British government was quoted in Danish press for ‘regret’ about the decision and is considering an appeal.

Formerly Great Britain doesn’t even know that Freedom of Expression is a positive value and is to be protected. It aids and abets fundamentalist religious intimidation, standing on the side of thugs, not on the side of civilization.

By Henrik R Clausen on October 15th, 2009 at 2:31 am

Sorry for the duplicate comment. The system gave me a PHP error message that made me think it was not submitted.

Webmaster: There’s a problem here in need of fixing.

Trackbacks